425 research outputs found

    Numerical comparison of pipe-column-separation models

    Get PDF
    Results comparing six column-separation numerical models for simulating localized vapor cavities and distributed vaporous cavitation in pipelines are presented. The discrete vapor-cavity model (DVCM) is shown to be quite sensitive to selected input parameters. For short pipeline systems, the maximum pressure rise following column separation can vary markedly for small changes in wave speed, friction factor, diameter, initial velocity, length of pipe, or pipe slope. Of the six numerical models, three perform consistently over a broad number of reaches. One of them, the discrete gas-cavity model, is recommended for general use as it is least sensitive to input parameters or to the selected discretization of the pipeline. Three models provide inconsistent estimates of the maximum pressure rise as the number of reaches is increased; however, these models do give consistent results provided the ratio of maximum cavity size to reach volume is kept below 10%.Angus R. Simpson and Anton Bergan

    Stochastic Co-design of Storage and Control for Water Distribution Systems

    Full text link
    Water distribution systems (WDSs) are typically designed with a conservative estimate of the ability of a control system to utilize the available infrastructure. The controller is subsequently designed and tuned based on the designed water distribution system. This sequential approach may lead to conservativeness in both design and control steps, impacting both operational efficiency and economic costs. In this work, we consider simultaneously designing infrastructure and developing a control strategy, the co-design problem, to improve the overall system efficiency. However, implementing a co-design problem for water distribution systems is a challenging task given the presence of stochastic variables (e.g. water demands and electricity prices). In this work, we propose a tractable stochastic co-design method to design the best tank size and optimal control parameters for WDS, where the expected operating costs are established based on Markov chain theory. We also give a theoretical result that investigates the average long-run co-design cost converging to the expected cost with probability 1. Furthermore, the method can also be applied to an existing WDS to improve operation of the system. We demonstrate the proposed co-design method on three examples and a real-world case study in South Australia

    Detection and location of a partial blockage in a pipeline using damping of fluid transients

    Get PDF
    The effects of a partial blockage on pipeline transients are investigated analytically. A partial blockage is simulated using an orifice equation, and the influence of the blockage on the unsteady pipe flow is considered in the governing equations using a Dirac delta function. A simplified, linear dimensionless governing equation has been derived, and an analytical solution expressed in terms of a Fourier series has been developed under nonvarying boundary conditions. The linear analysis indicates that pipe friction and a partial blockage both introduce damping on fluid transients. The friction damping and blockage damping are exponential for each of the individual harmonic components. For each individual harmonic component, the blockage-induced damping depends on the blockage magnitude and position and is also independent of measurement location and the transient event. A new blockage detection method using the blockage-induced transient damping is developed based on the analytical solution. The magnitude of the blockage-induced damping rate indicates the size of the blockage, and the ratios of different damping rates can be used to locate the blockage. The proposed blockage detection method has been successfully used in detecting, locating, and quantifying a pipe blockage based on laboratory experiments. [Abstract from author

    Developments in pipeline column separation experimentation

    Get PDF

    Waterlogging control for improved water and land use efficiencies: a systematic analysis

    Get PDF
    Submitted to Office of Water Research and Technology, U.S. Dept. of the Interior; December 1980.Bibliography: pages 135-138.OWRT project 14-34-0001-6211-C-7144

    Multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for economic cost, hydraulic reliability, and greenhouse gas emissions

    Get PDF
    In this paper, three objectives are considered for the optimization of water distribution systems (WDSs): the traditional objectives of minimizing economic cost and maximizing hydraulic reliability and the recently proposed objective of minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is particularly important to include the GHG minimization objective for WDSs involving pumping into storages or water transmission systems (WTSs), as these systems are the main contributors of GHG emissions in the water industry. In order to better understand the nature of tradeoffs among these three objectives, the shape of the solution space and the location of the Pareto-optimal front in the solution space are investigated for WTSs and WDSs that include pumping into storages, and the implications of the interaction between the three objectives are explored from a practical design perspective. Through three case studies, it is found that the solution space is a U-shaped curve rather than a surface, as the tradeoffs among the three objectives are dominated by the hydraulic reliability objective. The Pareto-optimal front of real-world systems is often located at the "elbow" section and lower "arm" of the solution space (i.e., the U-shaped curve), indicating that it is more economic to increase the hydraulic reliability of these systems by increasing pipe capacity (i.e., pipe diameter) compared to increasing pumping power. Solutions having the same GHG emission level but different cost-reliability tradeoffs often exist. Therefore, the final decision needs to be made in conjunction with expert knowledge and the specific budget and reliability requirements of the system. © 2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Wenyan Wu, Holger R. Maier, and Angus R. Simpso
    corecore